Caffeine, bad habits and a word from Gurdgeiff
Gurdgeiff said something very interesting by way of Ouspenski in his book “The Search for the Miraculous” or whatever the hell it’s called. (I dunno. I haven’t read the thing in 18 years. Maybe I’l pick it up again, maybe not. This quip stood out but most of it seemed like unforgivable drek.)
What he said, in essence, was that you have to be extraordinarily careful when you try to change. The massive web of interconnected stimuli action, attitude and reaction that make up your existence is more deeply intertwined than you are capable of imagining. The complete why and how of the way you exist and live your life in any particular regard can not really be determined.
So if you try to make sweeping habitual changes to your life, you have a very small chance of success. Smoking is a good habit to pick because it’s one I don’t indulge in, so I can freely make fun of those people.
If you were to try to stop smoking, you would have to change all the obvious oral stimulus/response comfort system. You’d have to recalibrate your bodies schedule on many levels. When do you break to smoke during the day, how does it impact your job? How do you tailor your job to your smoking habits and how is the dynamic tension of that interplay working. Then you have to think about the social aspect.
Who are your smoke buddies? How about friends? Do they smoke? Even if you get past the “will they be ok with you as a nonsmoker” you have to think about the level of social communication of smoking.
Watch a group of smokers sometime and stay far enough away that you can’t hear what they’re saying. You can tell an awful lot about who’s who by the patterns in which they puff, how they hold their cigarettes, etc. It’s really quite something.
So if you remove smoking, you have to readjust your conversational habits with those people.
On one hand, you could read all that and say “well those things need to be replaced with something else.” And while I suppose that’s within the realm of possibility, I can’t imagine anyone achieving it. Besides, there are an infinity of little tendrils that spin off from there that you’ll never be overtly conscious of.
The goal when you change a habit can not reasonably be to maintain the rest of the web of your existence the way it was but with one modification. You can’t achieve that. As soon as you make an intentional pull to your habits, things will start shifting around it.
It’s uncomfortable and strange. Weird problems crop up that seem like disruptions in your life that are “just bad timing” but in fact are things that are more tightly related than you realized.
What Gurdgeiff said was that these intentional changes must be made subtly and gradually. Give yourself time to shuffle and re-settle around what you’re trying to do. When you change too much, too radically you’re very liable to snap back completely.
This is on my mind because I’ve been rather impeccably dissatisfied with how I’m approaching this transition away from day trading (I did mention that right? Yeah, no more.)
The first thing that happens to me when my schedule isn’t pinned to the clock is that I start going to bed later and later and it rotates my schedule around the clock until I’m going to bed at about 3:00 and getting up at about 11. Now, that’s 8 hours sleep. It’s not like I start sleeping 14 hours a day.
But as much as I enjoy that pattern, it’s not particularly functional when you have to deal with the real world. See, it takes me a couple hours of revving up to attack the day. But by that time it’s pushing 2:30 in the afternoon. Most of the professional day is over. Things are winding up. Twitter is starting to get active.
And no matter how I slice it. Being “ready to go” by 2/2:30 in the afternoon is depressing. I know I’ve got 13 hours left, but it doesn’t feel that way. It feels like I’ve totally screwed off the day. As a result, I don’t get much of anything done. Then 6:00 comes and well… part of my head thinks of the day as being over anyway.
Bad cycle.
I’ve been trying to get to bed at about midnight. It took a couple weeks to perceive 1:00 am as “a bit too late.” But finally I’m looking at 11:30 pm as “time to wrap up.” But I couldn’t sleep.
I realized that heavy caffeine consumption well into the evening was most likely the culprit. Clearly I needed a cut off. So today I started with 5:00 being the cutoff time. No caffeine after 5. What that DIDN’T MEAN was to chug my last liter of diet dew at 4:56. But I’ll let it go for now.
So now I lay here in bed, it’s 12:25 and I’ve just typed a page of this and I’m pooped.
My plan is to keep this up for a while, then see what else I can add to it.
We’ll see how it goes.
Tags: SIP
March 26th, 2009 at 8:19 am
I get up at the crack of Oh Holy Shit It’s Early, but I don’t really get productive until around 11AM. If I sleep late, until like 9 or so, I feel all thrown off, even if I keep to the “schedule”. And I used to have such a lovely internal clock, too… I could lie down to sleep at around 10PM, telling myself “Have to be up by 7″ and bingo! I’d wake up at 7.
Now I say that and my body says “You mean Hong Kong time, right?”
March 26th, 2009 at 9:08 am
I’ll be alright once I twist my schedule back around. But this caffeine hangover nonsense in the meantime is thwacking me somethin’ awful.
March 26th, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Well, Darlin’… I wish you better luck with this than I’d ever have, AND I just posted my answers to those 30 questions you did a few days back.
Took the gun test too…
March 26th, 2009 at 9:57 pm
Ooh Ooh! Headin’ over :p
April 5th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Is that the same Gurdgeiff from the Bauhaus song, where Peter Murphy repeats “Gurdgeiff, Bennett, Jeeeeee-sus?”
April 5th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
Indeed it is. Interesting fellow. Far more impressed with himself then he dared admit. He is reported to have prided himself overmuch on being obtuse. So the closest to cogent treatment of his work is by P.D. Ouspensky in “In Search of the Miraculous” which is still nigh incomprehensible at parts. Though it’s been a while.
I haven’t had cause to re-read it in 17 years or so but, thumbing through my overly underlined copy now, I might give it an Evelyn Wood.